1974perfect (August 19, 2008 at 5:06 pm)

d3 is nothing compare to my top of the line canon 1ds mk3

girotube (August 13, 2008 at 4:10 am)

I LOve you!! come to meee! hahahahaThats my next D series..!

jgrowl (August 10, 2008 at 4:47 am)

Clearly you don't have a clue either. Canon EF lenses were introduced in 1987 with the first EOS cameras and were compatible with only those EOS cameras. Canon's previous line (the T50/T70/T90) used the older FD lenses that were also used by the cameras of the 1970s (ala A1, AE1 ...) .

repe112 (July 4, 2008 at 7:20 pm)

Want that so hard but very expensive.

ZhaoSing (June 23, 2008 at 4:49 am)

Dream Nikon D4 has 27.2 MP

BillieBobSmith (June 19, 2008 at 1:24 pm)

You should have directed this directly to me, it's in the wrong spot.But, I stand by what I said.

ppolgar (June 19, 2008 at 12:15 pm)

You're obviously not a Pro photographer. Your comments regarding Canon's are beyond ridiculous and clearly show that you don't what the hell you're talking about. I own both the Nikon D3 and Canon 1Ds Mark 2 and both are excellent. Both have their strengths and weaknesses. I don't understand you guys who make such stupid comments about something you know absolutely nothing about.

Mcbozburger (May 31, 2008 at 4:17 pm)

canon's only decent camera is the mark 3.NIKON RULE

coolchef1337 (May 31, 2008 at 4:46 am)

It looks awesome with the long lens!

hendriksholm (May 28, 2008 at 3:37 pm)

Oh no, the D60 is way ahead of the D3!!!Nah, just kidding! If you're new to DSRL (perhaps you're in the market for one?) then the D60 will do fine - no need to pay 4500 dollars extra for a camera that you'd first have to learn how to use (D60 can go AUTO) and then the D3 would not come with a lens either! Then you'd have to buy a proper lens (1-2000 dollars extra again).