|
macnerd93 (August 12, 2008 at 6:08 pm)
no they didn't OS X has always had transparency since Mac OS X 10.0 in 2001, they just made it much more visible in leopard
kevin2790910 (July 21, 2008 at 6:43 pm)
soooooooooooo cool! I want a macbook
keriah17 (June 3, 2008 at 6:38 am)
leopard looks so beautiful
emmitt2217 (February 19, 2008 at 9:13 pm)
doesn't matter because leopard did it better. haha.
emmitt2217 (February 19, 2008 at 9:12 pm)
agreed no point to aero, nor vista in general.Leopard puts everything together better. Vista sucks..... it's on my laptop.. which I'm not going to keep much longer because I'm getting a Mac book. My laptop has upgraded RAM, Video cards, processors, the works, but all the useless vista stuff runs it into the ground.Leopard is better hands down.
samplane123 (February 7, 2008 at 6:58 pm)
That is called an opinion. The people who say that are being biased. What did Leopard copy from Vista? Transparency. But so what? Nobody cares. There isn't that much point to Aero, the menu bar's transparency and the reflective dock anyway. It's just eye candy.
rml695 (January 19, 2008 at 11:24 pm)
I'm gonna put Leopard on my iBook G4 1.42 GHz notebook...I just hope it looks okay using the older screen (instead of the newer glossy screens of the MacBook, MacBook Pro and MacBook Air.
Speedu911 (December 7, 2007 at 4:08 am)
Buy a Vista
Tadozzo (December 4, 2007 at 8:07 pm)
O_o
leester92 (November 2, 2007 at 4:43 am)
i always have a bad time when im on a mac, its just.. hard to use... idk looks nice though |
