darkdreams911 (August 21, 2008 at 7:35 pm)

Here are some facts that get ignored the atmosphere is made up of 5140Ttons, thats 4009 Ttons of Nitrogen, 925Ttons of O2, 154Ttons of CO2 and 51Ttons of other stuff.Today man produces 34Gtons of CO2 a year, that less than 1/10 of 1% of current CO2 levels in the atmosphere.However we produce 1600Gtons of methane, methan is 21 time more potent a greenhouse gas and no one mentions it. Gore is an opportunist taking adavtage of bad science.

sunnydayone (August 21, 2008 at 7:31 pm)

You are totally clueless,but your posts probably earn you pocket money,deemoney.I am only in it for deemoney.

sunnydayone (August 21, 2008 at 7:28 pm)

You are very lazy for somebody so fired up with the Idea that AGW is not happening.I mean if you are going to make a difference to the global debate,which at present accepts AGW as 99.9% certain then you should be checking out what is going on,but it would appear you have not got a clue.Tell you what,give me the findings of ten natinal scientific academies,start with the Royal Society and then move on to the other European academies and then the North American academies,go on.

Dmoney3788 (August 21, 2008 at 4:44 pm)

...make any model fit what they want to say with all the assumptions that they put into it.

Dmoney3788 (August 21, 2008 at 4:43 pm)

It is funny that you should mention climatologists. The field is in it's infancy right now, to the point that with their models they have to make assumptions-a lot of them. One of the assumptions that was made was assuming that the population will become 15 billion in 2100. That is quite preposterous considering that all the experts agree that the population will level out at 9 billion. Climatologists seem to make a game out of who can show the worst warming pattern. After all, they can...

Dmoney3788 (August 21, 2008 at 4:31 pm)

Well why don't you post some stuff about what they are saying instead of just talking about them? If there is tons of stuff, then why don't you share a sample of it? Just one little tidbit of what they are saying?

sunnydayone (August 21, 2008 at 3:46 pm)

You seem to know so much,demony,get on to the top climatologists who advocate AGW,they convinced me,maybe they can help you.Or you may convert them!

sunnydayone (August 21, 2008 at 3:42 pm)

All the evidence is there for you to see,tons and tons of it,peer reviewed and supported by every scientific academy in the world,are you blind?or just dopey?AGW is real,it is happening,it has consequences and we have to deal with it.If you want to run away from reality,bury your head,that's fine.If you want to argue the fact then try taking on the worlds scientific academies,let me know how you get on.

Dmoney3788 (August 21, 2008 at 3:31 pm)

I wonder, how exactly did they take their measurements? Were they land based, satellite based, or from tree rings or something like that?

Dmoney3788 (August 21, 2008 at 3:28 pm)

I brought my evidence to the table here, lets see what you can bring. Sure, there are websites that are pro AGW out there, but we are talking right here. Why can't you bring some evidence here or at least link me to a website so that I can become as 'enlightened' as you are on the subject? If you don't provide counter evidence to my claims, then it shows that you can't and won't.